[FFmpeg-devel] Fwd: [RFC] libpostproc splitout

[Anton Khirnov]

Quoting Derek Buitenhuis (2024-11-22 13:38:01)
> I do not accept this warning, and I do not agree with your reasoning.
> 
> The entire point of that thread was paid work, and cost matters. I worded
> in an entirelty legitimate way.
> 
> The fact that all the BS that has happened on this list since and *this*
> is the result is, for lack of a better work, complete bullshit.
> 
> The CC is a lame duck.

+1

I naively thought it doesn't get much worse than the previous CC that
might as well have not existed, but you're plumbing new depths here,
what with arbitrary selective enforcement and private warnings. Real
good secret police stuff, congratulations.

> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: 	Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] libpostproc splitout
> Date: 	Thu, 21 Nov 2024 15:18:04 -0500
> From: 	Ronald S. Bultje <rsbultje at gmail.com>
> To: 	Derek Buitenhuis <derek.buitenhuis at gmail.com>
> CC: 	cc at ffmpeg.org
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Derek,
> 
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 11:04 AM Derek Buitenhuis <derek.buitenhuis at gmail.com <mailto:derek.buitenhuis at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     This work was very easy and not worth even remotely close to 5K euro.

I had the exact same thought when looking at that thread, and the only
reason I did not send it to ML was my being on vacation. So let me
correct that now:

Splitting out libpostproc is easy and not worth even remotely close to
5K euro.

-- 
Anton Khirnov