[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] avutil/log: Replace addresses in log output with simple ids

Soft Works softworkz at hotmail.com
Thu Mar 6 18:38:12 EET 2025


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-bounces at ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of
> Nicolas George
> Sent: Donnerstag, 6. März 2025 11:04
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] avutil/log: Replace addresses
> in log output with simple ids
> 
> ffmpegagent (HE12025-03-05):
> > Cc: softworkz <softworkz at hotmail.com>, Soft Works
> >  <softworkz-at-hotmail.com at ffmpeg.org>, Nicolas George
> <george at nsup.org>,
> >  Gyan Doshi <ffmpeg at gyani.pro>
> 
> Please do not Cc people who did not ask for it. Especially when headers
> say not to.

It is the GitGitGadget system which does this this automatically.
Each time when somebody replies, GGG adds the person to the CC list.
But I have removed you now and try to remove you again each time when you reply. 

> 
> > Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2025 18:19:40 +0000
> > From: ffmpegagent <ffmpegagent at gmail.com>
> > To: ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> > Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] avutil/log: Replace addresses
> in log
> >  output with simple ids
> 
> Sending a new version so soon when comments are still pending is a waste
> of everybody's time.

Gyan had asked to provide the ability for controlling this via a log flag. This was a substantial change to the patchset (1 => 3 commits, 1 => 6 changed files).

Isn't it rather wasting people's time when letting them review the first patchset even when knowing that V2 is substantially different?

Thanks
sw








More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list