[FFmpeg-devel] Access to the ARM server
Rémi Denis-Courmont
remi at remlab.net
Wed Mar 26 13:28:37 EET 2025
Hi,
I answered, but the position of the CC is such that there is nothing we can do about NG in general.
Suspension will not achieve anything (and in this particular case, seems a bit heavy-handed), and permanent ban is not something that the CC can do under the current CoC.
Br,
Le 25 mars 2025 11:32:38 GMT+02:00, Kieran Kunhya <kieran618 at googlemail.com> a écrit :
>Come on, this is being deliberately facetious, FFmpeg has no legal
>entity that they could give it to.
>The server was given to @Jean-Baptiste Kempf for the purposes of
>FFmpeg development and I host it.
>
>Martin makes extensive use of it for development.
>
>@Cc This is unnecessarily aggressive and I would like to report it.
>
>Kieran
>
>On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 8:55 AM Nicolas George <george at nsup.org> wrote:
>>
>> Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel (HE12025-03-25):
>> > The server belongs to @Jean-Baptiste Kempf <jb at videolan.org>
>>
>> Are you saying that the tweet that says “giving ***us*** a 160-core ARM
>> server” (emphasis mine) is a lie?
>>
>> --
>> Nicolas George
>
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list