[FFmpeg-user] Minimum Hardware

Reindl Harald h.reindl at thelounge.net
Wed Apr 6 17:11:18 CEST 2016

Am 06.04.2016 um 17:01 schrieb Moritz Barsnick:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 11:23:50 +0200, Francesco Turco wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016, at 10:13, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>>> FFmpeg neither supports vp9 nor x265 encoding so I don't
>>> think your question is FFmpeg-related.
>> Are you sure? I'm using the vp9 codec with ffmpeg without any problems
>> (except it being very slow...)
> I *think* what Carl Eugen meant was: Since vp9 and x265 are external
> codecs, and their performance, their tuning parameters, their latency
> are all basically aspects of those codec implementations, there's
> nothing ffmpeg-specific about their performance on your hardware and
> their tuning for lower latency. In other words, those topics may have a
> better place for discussion (or are already being discussed in other
> places). Not that it's not worth asking here...

the same would apply for most other things like libx264 too

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-user/attachments/20160406/4e999bd2/attachment.sig>

More information about the ffmpeg-user mailing list