[FFmpeg-user] Conversion wav -> mp3 -> wav

Kieran O Leary kieran.o.leary at gmail.com
Thu Jun 22 23:48:40 EEST 2017


Hi,


On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:20 PM, Rodolfo Medina <rodolfo.medina at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi all.
>
> As an experiment, I converted a .wav file to mp3 format and then back into
> wav
> again, just to see what happens:
>
>  $ ffmpeg -i file1.wav file1.mp3
>  $ ffmpeg -i file1.mp3 file2.wav
>
> I've always heard and read that the first step produces a loss in quality.


Yes, it is lossy compression.


>   So
> I would expect that to be seen in a reduction of size.


Yes, your mp3 is much much smaller than the WAV.


>   Instead, I was suprised
> to see that file1.wav and file2.wav are both 154M large.


Your WAV files contain 16-bit, 44khz stereo streams at 1411 kb/second. They
will always be the same file size, regardless of what values the samples
hold.


> Also the output of
> `ffmpeg -i' is almost the same for the two: in both cases, there is:
>
>  Duration: 00:15:10.84, bitrate: 1411 kb/s
>     Stream #0:0: Audio: pcm_s16le ([1][0][0][0] / 0x0001), 44100 Hz,
> stereo, s16, 1411 kb/s
>
> Why should it be any different?


> So I wonder, and am asking to you listers, in where that quality loss is
> shown
> and how it can be detected.


You'd have to analyze the samples in some way. I am more familiar with
video, so if I did something similar like:
File1.mov is 8-bit uncompressed video and 100 MB and it looks nice.
File 2.mpeg is an 8-bit mpeg1video and is 1MB and it looks TERRIBLE.
File3.mov is an 8-bit uncompressed transcode of File2.mpeg and it is 100MB
and looks TERRIBLE. But it's the same file size and ffmpeg -i probably
looks very similar.

If a better codec was used and it was difficult to tell the difference by
eye, i'd use something like QCTools which would allow me to view the
components of the video, and very quickly detect that a lossy compression
stage had occured.

Or maybe should we think and conclude that the
> original quality is restored with the second step...?
>

No, it hasn't. You just have the same loss of quality in File3.WAV that
existed in file2.mp3. It's just a bigger file size.

Cheers,

Kieran.

>
> Thanks for any help,
>
> Rodolfo
>
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-user mailing list
> ffmpeg-user at ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-user-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".


More information about the ffmpeg-user mailing list