[FFmpeg-user] ? About ffmpeg's prores implemention

Paul B Mahol onemda at gmail.com
Wed Sep 2 19:05:29 EEST 2020

On 8/31/20, Edward Park <kumowoon1025 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>> Again just typical FUD from same person.
> I'm not sure what you are referring to, what's there to spread fud about??

Closely read your text that you removed out.

>> It is obviously slower, hahaha.
> What is, AME or one of the prores encoders included in FFmpeg? I mean
> obviously it'd depend on the job and hardware but for what it's worth I
> compared prores_ks with 4444xq and it took around twice the wallclock time.
> It did indeed take way more than twice the cpu time though, but if its
> output has problems then the whole point is moot :/

Your comparison is not scientifically proven and thus is highly
personally biased.

More information about the ffmpeg-user mailing list