[Libav-user] Would anyone find an OS X / Cocoa / Swift wrapper for Libav useful?

Lucas Soltic lucas.soltic at orange.fr
Tue Jan 27 08:32:47 CET 2015

> Le 27 janv. 2015 à 07:26, wm4 <nfxjfg at googlemail.com> a écrit :
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:39:20 -0700
> Bradley O'Hearne <brado at bighillsoftware.com> wrote:
>>> On Jan 26, 2015, at 8:19 PM, wm4 <nfxjfg at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> I think the problem is rather that you're not even trying to contribute.
>>> This is an open source project. You have to get involved, not expect
>>> that "support" will take care of you.
>> I’ve been on this mailing list over three years. Numerous times I’ve attempted to engage this list in discussions in hopes of definitively understanding FFmpeg at a deeper level, and leaving a discussion trail which others traveling the same path which I have could benefit from who  I’ve inquired about documentation, design and architectural decisions. I’ve asked questions about how various X things are accomplished for the same reason. I’ve contributed a fully working real-time capture-encode-stream app whose code has sat on Github for over a year and has been linked to several times on this mailing list. This time, I once again tried to find a way I could contribute something to FFmpeg which based on the clients I serve, is exactly what FFmpeg needs — and so I appealed to the community in hopes of finding others whom it would help as well. All of this is directly aimed at contributing. 
>> In all of the cases above, the efforts proved futile (save some of the folks I’ve met and good conversations I’ve had a result off-list as a result). The very ingrained collective personality of this mailing list is a one-trick pony — when you can’t stand toe-to-toe technically, turn the turrets on the person, and make the conversation personal. Same thing here…avoid the issue, fault the person. If you want a fail-safe formula for pushing contributors away, well you’ve got it.
> No, no. As I said before, there are barely any developers on this list.
> I guess people don't like giving tech support (especially for free). If
> you want to get involved, get on ffmpeg-devel and on the IRC channel.
> As for contributing... I haven't seen a single FFmpeg patch from you,
> and not a single post from you on the ffmpeg-devel list in the last few
> years (you know... the place where ffmpeg devs actually reading any
> posts).
>> As I stated before…you win. Your worries about threatening FFmpeg by bringing its API out of the realm of the propellor-heads and propagating clarity and understanding rather than keeping FFmpeg a black art are unnecessary. I’ll contribute elsewhere.
> Well, you're not contributing in the first place. Your suggested wrapper
> would have no value for the project either, because it'd be completely
> Apple locked-in.
> If you want to view yourself as a victim of the evil open source
> conspiracy, you can do that, but please refrain from such stupid
> allegations. It's quite funny to hear that when I've always argued for
> API simplification and introducing higher level APIs.
> _______________________________________________
> Libav-user mailing list
> Libav-user at ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-user

wm4, you're being awfully demoralizing and narrow minded. 
This discussion is already by itself a great contribution: giving ideas about what should be improved and pointing out what are FFmpeg weakness. Instead of taking advantage of these you just throw the efforts away. Just the kind of stuff that makes sure you won't get more source code contribution.

More information about the Libav-user mailing list