[Ffmpeg-cvslog] CVS: ffmpeg/libavcodec ac3enc.c,1.29,1.30
Sat Apr 8 01:12:17 CEST 2006
Corey Hickey wrote:
> I would expect that the change is intended and the regresssion results
> should be altered correspondingly. Justin, please comment. I'll patch
> the results tomorrow if I don't hear otherwise.
Yes, that would be the expected result for any 44100/22050/11025 Hz
files. I see you have updated regression results already...great!
For future reference, if I submit a patch for approval which would
knowingly break regression tests, should I include an update in the
patch or should I just mention it and leave it to the admins if/when the
patch is accepted?
It didn't even cross my mind to check this time...sorry.
More information about the ffmpeg-cvslog