[Ffmpeg-devel] Google SoC: We're In!
Thu Apr 27 16:07:11 CEST 2006
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 03:38:53PM +0200, Alex Beregszaszi wrote:
> > > Implementation is nasty. Visually WMV is basically nasty. I dont see any
> > > improvement :)
> > Well, our WMV2 decoder still has a major shortcoming in that it decodes
> > many samples, those with J-frames with very heavy artifacts. Whatever..
> I have never encountered a WMV1/2/3 sample in the wild. Only for certain
> content, that I dont download. Is that just I?
You must be living on a strange planet then ;) WMV* is popular for
internet streaming for example and better than RealVideo because we have
a free decoder. If it weren't incomplete it would be even better.
More information about the ffmpeg-devel