[Ffmpeg-devel] Google SoC: We're In!
Thu Apr 27 17:13:45 CEST 2006
On Thursday 27 April 2006 16:07, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 03:38:53PM +0200, Alex Beregszaszi wrote:
> > > > Implementation is nasty. Visually WMV is basically nasty. I dont see
> > > > any improvement :)
> > >
> > > Well, our WMV2 decoder still has a major shortcoming in that it decodes
> > > many samples, those with J-frames with very heavy artifacts.
> > > Whatever..
> > I have never encountered a WMV1/2/3 sample in the wild. Only for certain
> > content, that I dont download. Is that just I?
> You must be living on a strange planet then ;) WMV* is popular for
> internet streaming for example and better than RealVideo because we have
> a free decoder.
> If it weren't incomplete it would be even better.
Comon, don't use such convoluted language. I almost cannot comprehend what
you're trying to say ;-)
More information about the ffmpeg-devel