[Ffmpeg-devel] Google SoC: We're In!
Thu Apr 27 19:45:40 CEST 2006
On 27/04/06, Rich Felker <dalias at aerifal.cx> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 04:07:11PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 03:38:53PM +0200, Alex Beregszaszi wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Implementation is nasty. Visually WMV is basically nasty. I dont
> see any
> > > > > improvement :)
> > > >
> > > > Well, our WMV2 decoder still has a major shortcoming in that it
> > > > many samples, those with J-frames with very heavy
> artifacts. Whatever..
> > >
> > > I have never encountered a WMV1/2/3 sample in the wild. Only for
> > > content, that I dont download. Is that just I?
> > You must be living on a strange planet then ;) WMV* is popular for
> Maybe he just has a gf and therefore doesn't search out certain types
> of files... ;)
Hey, they may take almost all of your time, but you can still have some time
to watch streaming TV or music videos when they're not around :p
"We're busy running out of time"
More information about the ffmpeg-devel