[Ffmpeg-devel] Google SoC: We're In!
Thu Apr 27 19:37:28 CEST 2006
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 04:07:11PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 03:38:53PM +0200, Alex Beregszaszi wrote:
> > > > Implementation is nasty. Visually WMV is basically nasty. I dont see any
> > > > improvement :)
> > >
> > > Well, our WMV2 decoder still has a major shortcoming in that it decodes
> > > many samples, those with J-frames with very heavy artifacts. Whatever..
> > I have never encountered a WMV1/2/3 sample in the wild. Only for certain
> > content, that I dont download. Is that just I?
> You must be living on a strange planet then ;) WMV* is popular for
Maybe he just has a gf and therefore doesn't search out certain types
of files... ;)
More information about the ffmpeg-devel