[Ffmpeg-devel] Matroska Patch

Steve Lhomme steve.lhomme
Sat Mar 25 07:27:08 CET 2006

Rich Felker wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 02:16:32AM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 07:19:58PM -0500, Rich Felker wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 08:22:37PM +0000, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
>>>>> So, everybody agrees that block_time is a better mnemonic ?
>>> Not everybody, and you know it.. There have been at least two people
>>> (and one other than my irrelevant self) who have spoken against it.
>> I have heard nobody speak up against a different (better) variable name.
> I still want to hear Steve's explanation of the error message. He
> conveniently goes silent when we ask, of course...

Sorry, but I have a life. I don't spend my time waiting for your emails 
to answer right away.

We have moved to MSVC2005 recently and there's no problem with time. As 
I said it may come (again) from MinGW, but I haven't tried.

Anyway "timestamp" is not as good. This function deals with cluster 
time, block time and display time. They are all separate variables. And 
I think an appropriate name for each would help anyone new to Matroska 
reading the code.


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list