[Ffmpeg-devel] Re: Advocating periodic releases
Sat Oct 7 16:37:27 CEST 2006
On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 15:08:38 +0200
Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 12:41:21AM +0200, Aurelien Jacobs wrote:
> > On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 20:01:32 +0200
> > Hauke Duden <H.NS.Duden at gmx.net> wrote:
> > > Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > > root at mphq said mantis uses php && php programmers cant program -> secholes
> > > > -> not ok on mphq
> > > >
> > > > does anyone have any non php non bugzilla suggestions?
> > > >
> > >
> > > roundup ! (http://roundup.sf.net)
> > >
> > > It's a great tracker, done in python. Very easy to customize, stable
> > > and, above all, simple to install and maintain!
> > That's what I wanted to suggest too.
> > AFAIR, previous discussions about bug tracker concluded that a proper
> > email interface is a must. And it seems that roundup has a full
> > featured email interface.
> > It is probably a very good candidate.
> > (That said, I personnaly don't care much about bug tracker)
> so from the suggestions whats left is
> trac & roundup
> has anyone used both and could comment about advantages/disadvantages?
I can't really comment on both. But one big difference between them is
that trac is a full project managment system, including source/history
browsing, timeline/roadmap, wiki...
Roundup on the other hand is only and simply a bug tracker.
Some real life roundup examples seems in order:
And the feature set is probably worth a read:
More information about the ffmpeg-devel