[Ffmpeg-devel] Re: Advocating periodic releases
Tue Oct 10 11:50:58 CEST 2006
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 04:37:27PM +0200, Aurelien Jacobs wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 15:08:38 +0200
> Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
> > Hi
> > On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 12:41:21AM +0200, Aurelien Jacobs wrote:
> > > On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 20:01:32 +0200
> > > Hauke Duden <H.NS.Duden at gmx.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > > > root at mphq said mantis uses php && php programmers cant program -> secholes
> > > > > -> not ok on mphq
> > > > >
> > > > > does anyone have any non php non bugzilla suggestions?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > roundup ! (http://roundup.sf.net)
> > > >
> > > > It's a great tracker, done in python. Very easy to customize, stable
> > > > and, above all, simple to install and maintain!
> > >
> > > That's what I wanted to suggest too.
> > > AFAIR, previous discussions about bug tracker concluded that a proper
> > > email interface is a must. And it seems that roundup has a full
> > > featured email interface.
> > > It is probably a very good candidate.
> > > (That said, I personnaly don't care much about bug tracker)
> > so from the suggestions whats left is
> > trac & roundup
> > has anyone used both and could comment about advantages/disadvantages?
> I can't really comment on both. But one big difference between them is
> that trac is a full project managment system, including source/history
> browsing, timeline/roadmap, wiki...
sounds bloated ...
> Roundup on the other hand is only and simply a bug tracker.
> Some real life roundup examples seems in order:
> And the feature set is probably worth a read:
could someone setup some roundup for testing and evaluation? (on mphq
if admins agree and its easy and secure)
as bug states (they can be configured i think) the following (from some
previous bugzilla flames) would be nice (comments welcome of course)
newBug initial state for new bugreports
verified someone succeded in reproducing the bug
analyzed it is understood why things dont work like they should
fixed fix is in cvs
fixed&checked someone confirmed that the fix really fixed the bug
worksForMe bug is not reproduceable
duplicate theres a different bugreport which describes the same bug
wontFix the bug is real but wont be fixed
invalid its the users fault (not reading manual, missuse of something)
needMoreInfo further information is needed for reproducing the bug
newPatch initial state for new patches
ok patch is ok, should be applied ASAP
applied patch has been applied to cvs
rejected patch is fundamentally broken and should not be aplied
needChanges changes are needed before the patch can be applied
newRequest initial state of new feature requests
implemented feature has been implemented
wontImplement feature request is valid but wont be implemented
invalidReq unclear, or several unrelated things in one feature request
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
In the past you could go to a library and read, borrow or copy any book
Today you'd get arrested for mere telling someone where the library is
More information about the ffmpeg-devel