[Ffmpeg-devel] overall license review - adding proper license headers
Sun Oct 8 12:00:07 CEST 2006
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 10:32:58AM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 09:01:43PM +0200, Aurelien Jacobs wrote:
> > On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 15:38:51 +0200
> > Diego Biurrun <diego at biurrun.de> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 04:13:47PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > > >
> > > > [...]
> > >
> > > Now that all files carry license headers, I have one final thing I wish
> > > to accomplish: Currently all our files carry the boilerplate LGPL
> > > license header, which reads "This library ...". I'd like to replace
> > > "This library" with "FFmpeg", which is a bit more descriptive, and add
> > > one line that says "This file is part of FFmpeg.".
> > I basicaly agree, but I wonder if it wouldn't be better to write
> > "libavcodec" (respectively libavformat, libswscale...) instead of FFmpeg ?
> No, I'd go with FFmpeg, it's more general and thus more resistant to
> renaming :)
Baptiste, Michael, it seems the commit notification mail is being held
in the queue ..
More information about the ffmpeg-devel