[Ffmpeg-devel] overall license review - adding proper license headers

Baptiste Coudurier baptiste.coudurier
Sun Oct 8 19:56:21 CEST 2006


Diego Biurrun a ?crit :
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 10:32:58AM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 09:01:43PM +0200, Aurelien Jacobs wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 15:38:51 +0200
>>> Diego Biurrun <diego at biurrun.de> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 04:13:47PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>>>>> [...] 
>>>> Now that all files carry license headers, I have one final thing I wish
>>>> to accomplish: Currently all our files carry the boilerplate LGPL
>>>> license header, which reads "This library ...".  I'd like to replace
>>>> "This library" with "FFmpeg", which is a bit more descriptive, and add
>>>> one line that says "This file is part of FFmpeg.".
>>> I basicaly agree, but I wonder if it wouldn't be better to write
>>> "libavcodec" (respectively libavformat, libswscale...) instead of FFmpeg ?
>> No, I'd go with FFmpeg, it's more general and thus more resistant to
>> renaming :)
> Committed yesterday.
> Baptiste, Michael, it seems the commit notification mail is being held
> in the queue ..

Thanks I approved it.

Baptiste COUDURIER                              GnuPG Key Id: 0x5C1ABAAA
Key fingerprint                 8D77134D20CC9220201FC5DB0AC9325C5C1ABAAA
checking for life_signs in -lkenny... no

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list