[Ffmpeg-devel] Re: Advocating periodic releases

Víctor Paesa wzrlpy
Mon Oct 16 09:58:33 CEST 2006

> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> theres no closed state in my proposal, and i also see no sense in one
> Of course you need a closed state. A bug is closed when it is fixed and
> confirmed fixed and committed etc.  -- or confirmed that its a
> duplicate, not a bug, etc. Closed is the final state which confirms the
> resolution -- and should not be done by assigned developer who made
> resolution. The original requester can close a bug too.
>> [...]

You're asuming that there's just one final state, but IMHO
"duplicate", "not a bug", "confirmed fixed", etc are very
valid final states, and they convey more info than "closed".


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list