[Ffmpeg-devel] Re: Advocating periodic releases
Mon Oct 16 14:27:17 CEST 2006
V?ctor Paesa wrote:
>> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>> theres no closed state in my proposal, and i also see no sense in one
>> Of course you need a closed state. A bug is closed when it is fixed and
>> confirmed fixed and committed etc. -- or confirmed that its a
>> duplicate, not a bug, etc. Closed is the final state which confirms the
>> resolution -- and should not be done by assigned developer who made
>> resolution. The original requester can close a bug too.
> You're asuming that there's just one final state, but IMHO
> "duplicate", "not a bug", "confirmed fixed", etc are very
> valid final states, and they convey more info than "closed".
"closed" is the state which confirms the resolution is correct. An
alternative next state after "fixed" etc. is to re-open it again.
More information about the ffmpeg-devel