[Ffmpeg-devel] [PATCH] mjpeg cleanup and again interlaced fix

Diego Biurrun diego
Sat Apr 14 12:22:17 CEST 2007

On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 11:57:22AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 03:31:15AM +0200, Baptiste Coudurier wrote:
> > 
> > Honestly problem is that you too oftenly do that, and people is not
> > caring at all, look at how many people answer or discuss about sensitive
> > topics, so people might think but not say because they don't want to
> > fight/flame.
> this is ffmpeg-dev people do flame if they disagree you must be blind if
> you cant see that
> if noone complains then noone disagrees thats pretty much the definition of
> disgagree

You have things backwards.  That's the definition of not speaking up.
Disagreement is when you have a different opinion.  It's a necessary but
not sufficient prerequisite for speaking up.

Not everybody likes to flame, notice that some people here immediately
pull out when flamage ensues and rather give in than fight.  It's a
matter of considering the time and annoyance worth the result.

For example, I *could* speak up again about where to put the AC3 parsing
code or I could just let it be.  In the meantime there remains an
unfixed bug in FFmpeg...


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list