[Ffmpeg-devel] Re: libavformat cruft

Diego Biurrun diego
Mon Feb 5 19:32:40 CET 2007

On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 04:02:33PM +0100, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
> Baptiste Coudurier wrote:
> >
> >Diego Biurrun wrote:
> >>On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 04:34:26PM +0100, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
> >>>Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >>>>On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 07:26:44PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> >>>>>On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 07:13:27PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> >>>>>>Mans removed these two.  What about img.c now?  Can it be removed?
> >>>>>Other files which appear unused are cutils.c, jpeg.c, sgi.c, yuv.c.
> >>>>all the img.c and related files can be removed if they work with img2
> >>>cutils still appears in the Makefile, but img.c jpeg.c sgi.c yuv.c dont. 
> >>>Could someone svn delete them?
> >>Can somebody confirm that this stuff works with img2 now?
> >
> >Honestly it should, code is disabled since I removed AVImageFormat,
> >sgi was broken anyway.
> >
> Maybe Diego means we should keep the code around as a source of 
> inspiration for re-implementing the sgi image codec. But anyone 
> interested can always retrieve it with svn co -r
> img2 jpeg streams are known to work. yuv... well, I have problems, but 
> since I'm not sure the problem is not with my options, I will refrain 
> until Im sure.

OK, according to Baptiste, all of yuv.c, img.c, jpeg.c are redundant.  I
will remove them at the end of the week.

What about sgi.c?  Shall we keep it as a visible reference or remove it?
It's not hard to get it back from the repository, but maybe somebody
thinks that its chances to get ported increase if it is a bit more
visible ..

So I will hold off removing sgi.c until we come to a decision there.


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list