[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Move the video size and rate abbreviations system from libavformat to libavcodec

Benoit Fouet benoit.fouet
Tue Jun 12 10:07:23 CEST 2007


Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 09:35:58AM +0200, Benoit Fouet wrote:
>   
>> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>     
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 02:35:47PM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> On date Monday 2007-06-11 14:11:36 +0200, Benoit Fouet encoded:
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Stefano Sabatini wrote:
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>>>> Index: libavformat/utils.c
>>>>>> ===================================================================
>>>>>> --- libavformat/utils.c	(revision 9235)
>>>>>> +++ libavformat/utils.c	(working copy)
>>>>>> -int parse_frame_rate(int *frame_rate, int *frame_rate_base, const char *arg)
>>>>>> +int parse_frame_rate(int *frame_rate_num, int *frame_rate_den, const char *arg)
>>>>>>   
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>             
>>>>> why do you rename those parameters ?
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> First solution:
>>>> int parse_frame_rate(int *frame_rate, int *frame_rate_base, const char *arg)
>>>> {
>>>>     AVRational frame_rate_q;
>>>>     int ret = av_parse_video_frame_rate(&frame_rate_q, arg);
>>>>     *frame_rate= frame_rate_q.num;
>>>>     *frame_rate_base= frame_rate_q.den;
>>>>     return ret;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> Second one:
>>>> int parse_frame_rate(int *frame_rate_num, int *frame_rate_den, const char *arg)
>>>> {
>>>>     AVRational frame_rate;
>>>>     int ret = av_parse_video_frame_rate(&frame_rate, arg);
>>>>     *frame_rate_num= frame_rate.num;
>>>>     *frame_rate_den= frame_rate.den;
>>>>     return ret;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> The second one looks better to me, but that doesn't really matter, and
>>>> yep, it's a cosmetic change, it seems I can't resist without making them ;-),
>>>> so please choose which you prefer (first one attached).
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> i think iam fine with the patch
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>> which one ? :)
>>     
>
> i think there is just one attached
> either way i have no strong preferance for one of the above 2 ...
>   

i applied the one Stefano prefered :)

Ben
-- 
Purple Labs S.A.
www.purplelabs.com




More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list