[FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Runtime-inited versus Hardcoded tables.

Michael Niedermayer michaelni
Thu Jan 31 17:09:48 CET 2008

On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 05:57:14PM +0200, Uoti Urpala wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 11:01 -0500, Rich Felker wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 03:34:15PM +0200, Uoti Urpala wrote:
> > > without much speed loss (yes the cmp function can be optimized
> > 
> > Once again I'm glad Uoti has no authority in this project...
> Why? Do you have reason to believe that what I said would not be
> technically correct? What kind of speed loss do you claim to be
> inevitable if you drop motion_est.o size to half with a reasonable
> amount of work? I wouldn't be surprised if it got noticeably faster, the
> current implementation wastes quite a lot of cache.

A patch which makes it smaller at the same or better speed
or one which makes it faster at the same size, is welcome.

Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Let us carefully observe those good qualities wherein our enemies excel us
and endeavor to excel them, by avoiding what is faulty, and imitating what
is excellent in them. -- Plutarch
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20080131/78fdf27e/attachment.pgp>

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list