[FFmpeg-devel] FFMPEG contact info request for Microsoft logo certificationdocument

[Måns Rullgård]

"Fran?ois Revol" <revol at free.fr> writes:

>> That's the situation.
>> Once again thank you very much for your help.
>
> Hmm, aren't signed binaries in conflict with the (L)GPL ?
> Anyone receiving your application should be able to replace the 
> original ffmpeg.exe by one they built themselves.
>
> Unless signing is just about warning users but not enforced by the code 
> using ffmpeg.exe, it might contradict this.

As I've understood it, you're required to supply source code, but
there is no requirement that this source code actually be useful to
the user.  For instance, there is no need to include the compiler (or
other tools) used to build it.

-- 
M?ns Rullg?rd
mans at mansr.com