[FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] FFmpeg Foundation
Wed Dec 2 02:47:38 CET 2009
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 06:58:03PM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbultje at gmail.com> wrote:
> > We haven't decided on a name
> > yet, although people agree that we dislike "FFmpeg Foundation" - if
> > you can suggest better names, please do so in this thread.
> Today would be a great day to suggest names. We still haven't found
> any good one and I'm planning to finish this by sometime next week,
> which means I'll probably have to do a vote between the various
> proposed names this weekend / early next week.
> If you have a great name suggestion, please propose it here. Every
> developer (a person with SVN access or regular + recent patch
> contributions) may propose names, and to prevent this from becoming
> one big mess, I'll ask that every proposed name is "me too'ed" by at
> least one more developer.
> So far, I have heard the following (these can be considered to be in
> the "me too'ed" already-stage):
> * Free Media Tech / freemediatech.org
> * FFMTech (Foundation for Free Media Technologies)
> * FFmedia (Foundation for Free Media)
> * OMF (Open Media Foundation)
> * FFm.org (Foundation for Free Media)
> * FFmpeg Foundation
wherent some of the media supposed to be multimedia?
* Free MultiMedia Tech / freemediatech.org
* FFMTech (Foundation for Free MultiMedia Technologies)
* FFmedia (Foundation for Free MultiMedia)
* OMF (Open MultiMedia Foundation)
* FFm.org (Foundation for Free MultiMedia)
* FFmpeg Foundation
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Many things microsoft did are stupid, but not doing something just because
microsoft did it is even more stupid. If everything ms did were stupid they
would be bankrupt already.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the ffmpeg-devel