[FFmpeg-devel] [VOTE] please vote for our NGO name
Sat Dec 19 15:29:41 CET 2009
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 06:21:49AM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 02:36:38PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:05:32PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:00:39AM +0100, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Some of these objections are IMO valid, but the question is: why
> > > > didn't they have been arised when both the names and the voting
> > > > procedure was discussed?
> > >
> > > 1) I don't currently have time to reply to every email in realtime.
> > > 2) The objections *did* get raised, but were promptly ignored when the
> > > voting started, i.e. all the bad names were put up as candidates.
> > You can express your objections in the vote like everyone else by ranking
> > names you object to worse than ones you do not object to.
> > Also suggesting another name required just 2 developers, this did not happen
Which 2 developers did suggest which name, when and where that was not
> > What iam trying to say here is that noone not just not you proposed other
> > names
Which names where proposed (by 2+ ffmpeg developers) that where not included?
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
The greatest way to live with honor in this world is to be what we pretend
to be. -- Socrates
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the ffmpeg-devel