[FFmpeg-devel] [VOTE] please vote for our NGO name
Sat Dec 19 15:53:53 CET 2009
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 03:29:41PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 06:21:49AM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 02:36:38PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:05:32PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:00:39AM +0100, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Some of these objections are IMO valid, but the question is: why
> > > > > didn't they have been arised when both the names and the voting
> > > > > procedure was discussed?
> > > >
> > > > 1) I don't currently have time to reply to every email in realtime.
> > > > 2) The objections *did* get raised, but were promptly ignored when the
> > > > voting started, i.e. all the bad names were put up as candidates.
> > >
> > > You can express your objections in the vote like everyone else by ranking
> > > names you object to worse than ones you do not object to.
> > >
> > > Also suggesting another name required just 2 developers, this did not happen
> > False.
> Which 2 developers did suggest which name, when and where that was not
Dominik proposed "Open Multimedia Technologies Foundation". I liked it.
Where does this 2 number come from anyway? This voting farce seems to
spawn new regulations every five minutes.
More information about the ffmpeg-devel