Wed Jan 28 00:19:03 CET 2009
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 09:24:20PM +1100, Peter Ross wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 09:30:00PM -0800, Mike Melanson wrote:
> > Jai Menon wrote:
> > >
> > > On that note, it might be good to list out what exactly the
> > > "volunteers" would be required to do.
> > > I'm guessing its more complicated than just labeling bugs on roundup
> > > to release milestones and tracking them.
> > I want about 95% test coverage in FATE.
> > Steven/Dashcloud: Are you reading? I know you were making a list of
> > release tasks.
> Suggestions for a release criteria:
> 2. FATE test converage passes for all platforms of interest.
> 3. All 'important' bugs reported in roundup fixed/closed.
> 4. No half-implemented functionality that may break existing user apps.
> (e.g. http://roundup.ffmpeg.org/roundup/ffmpeg/issue582)
> 5. Endurance/memleak testing on film-length files.
Only important issues can be addressed. The criterion is simple:
whatever gets done before the release date is important, everything
else obviously is not.
Since we're going to have the bug-squashing weekend on 14/15, we can
make the release a week later.
More information about the ffmpeg-devel