[FFmpeg-devel] Indeo3 maintainer?
Mon Jul 6 14:33:35 CEST 2009
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 02:19:44PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 01:38:07PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 08:42:08PM -0700, Baptiste Coudurier wrote:
> > > On 07/05/2009 08:26 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > >> On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 02:28:41PM +0200, Reimar D?ffinger wrote:
> > >>> Hello,
> > >>> am I right that we have no maintainer for indeo3 (only Michael in his
> > >>> "fallback" role)?
> > >>
> > >> too much is falling back on me, iam failing misserably to maintain code
> > >> that is mine to maintain let alone suff like the obfuscated indeo3 ...
> > >
> > > Why not delegating some files ? ;)
> > the ones id love to delegate or love to have some co maintainer for are
> > not things anyone wants or is capable to work on it seems.
> > For example id love to see others help with
> > * H264 decoder, its important and rather time consuming to fix issues
> I think a problem that the H.264 decoder has is its sheer size. I tried
> twice to refactor parts of it, but failed. Neither splitting off svq3.c
> nor splitting off the parser-specific code was successful.
> I suspect you could get more help if you managed to get that beast
> refactored into more manageable pieces. I faintly remember Jason saying
> something to that effect...
It is very easy to factorize it if we are willing to ignore some style issues
i mean one always can split and use
this would sidestep any possible issues with inining from hard spliting in
seperate .o files and it always could later be changed to a real split where
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
There will always be a question for which you do not know the correct awnser.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the ffmpeg-devel