[FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] the future of libamr
Tue Jun 9 21:53:55 CEST 2009
I'm sorry to interrupt here, but you both seem to be miscommunicating
Baptiste Coudurier <baptiste.coudurier at gmail.com> writes:
> You don't understand what I am trying to say here. This is about "you"
> using "I" instead of "we". This is not about "you" having a credibility
> problem if that is so, it is about "FFmpeg".
that would be appropriate if these negotations were lead on a public
mailing list like this. However are not. Instead, they happen in form of
a dialoge. A dialogue has exactly two participants, which means that the
separation between "I" and "us" is not a choice, but a matter of fact.
> When you are speaking on behalf of FFmpeg, I think you should always use
> "we" and "us".
I don't have the impression that Diego makes these negotiations on his
own account and know pretty well when the "I" and when the "we" is
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
More information about the ffmpeg-devel