[FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] the future of libamr

Baptiste Coudurier baptiste.coudurier
Tue Jun 9 23:23:26 CEST 2009

On 6/9/2009 12:53 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> I'm sorry to interrupt here, but you both seem to be miscommunicating
> quite heavily.
> Baptiste Coudurier <baptiste.coudurier at gmail.com> writes:
>> You don't understand what I am trying to say here. This is about "you"
>> using "I" instead of "we". This is not about "you" having a credibility
>> problem if that is so, it is about "FFmpeg".
> that would be appropriate if these negotations were lead on a public
> mailing list like this.

I don't think so. When someone represents an entity I don't think he
speaks by saying "I" or "me" even in private negotations.

> [..]
>> When you are speaking on behalf of FFmpeg, I think you should always use
>> "we" and "us".
> I don't have the impression that Diego makes these negotiations on his
> own account and know pretty well when the "I" and when the "we" is
> appropriate.

I quote the sentence Diego used, and what I think about it.

Baptiste COUDURIER                              GnuPG Key Id: 0x5C1ABAAA
Key fingerprint                 8D77134D20CC9220201FC5DB0AC9325C5C1ABAAA
FFmpeg maintainer                                  http://www.ffmpeg.org

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list