[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Implement av_find_pix_fmt_descriptor* functions
Sun Mar 22 02:13:58 CET 2009
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 01:47:17AM +0100, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> Hi all.
> I'm not sure if is better:
> which is similar to:
> which is more similar to:
> I think "get" is more appropriate for the first case
> (av_get_pix_fmt_descriptor) since we don't have to execute a search
> but just pickup the pixdesc from the internal array, while "find"
> looks more appropriate in the second case.
> Anyway I don't have a strong opinion, so I'd like to hear your
> As for the little test I'll drop it when committing.
what is the point in wraper functions around
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
I hate to see young programmers poisoned by the kind of thinking
Ulrich Drepper puts forward since it is simply too narrow -- Roman Shaposhnik
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the ffmpeg-devel