[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] G722 decoder
Tue Mar 24 01:08:27 CET 2009
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:19:04PM +0100, Benjamin Larsson wrote:
> Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Benjamin Larsson <banan at ludd.ltu.se> wrote:
> >> Sure but I'm just trying to compromise so we just don't let this code go
> >> to waste. Until we re license (when pigs fly or whatever) the code would
> >> still be under LGPL.
> > Yeah, it's true. The thing is, if ffmpeg is LGPL2.1 (or later) and the
> > code is LGPL2.1, then requiring --enable-gpl for it to be compiled is
> > funny.
> > anyway, in the end yes I support your idea of not letting it bitrot.
> > Ronald
> We could add a --enable-lgpl2.1_but_not_later but I think that this is
> an acceptable compromise.
i agree to the gpl compromise
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Opposition brings concord. Out of discord comes the fairest harmony.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the ffmpeg-devel