[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] G722 decoder
Mon Mar 23 22:19:04 CET 2009
Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Benjamin Larsson <banan at ludd.ltu.se> wrote:
>> Sure but I'm just trying to compromise so we just don't let this code go
>> to waste. Until we re license (when pigs fly or whatever) the code would
>> still be under LGPL.
> Yeah, it's true. The thing is, if ffmpeg is LGPL2.1 (or later) and the
> code is LGPL2.1, then requiring --enable-gpl for it to be compiled is
> anyway, in the end yes I support your idea of not letting it bitrot.
We could add a --enable-lgpl2.1_but_not_later but I think that this is
an acceptable compromise.
More information about the ffmpeg-devel