Wed May 6 10:37:46 CEST 2009
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:33 AM, Baptiste Coudurier
<baptiste.coudurier at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Vitor,
> On 5/6/2009 12:23 AM, Vitor Sessak wrote:
>> I was expecting Michael to reject my patch, not the list moderators (see
> Sorry :/
> Patch is huge :(
> List says your mail is 800k !!!! ?
> Cause: Message body is too big: 822865 bytes with a limit of 200 KB
> I thought that was a mistake.
Have you seen the sheer size of the TwinVQ tables? Hopefully they are
a lesson to codec developers to never do such an insane thing ever
The easiest way to deal with this would probably be to approve the
tables separately so that a megabyte patch doesn't have to be sent
More information about the ffmpeg-devel