Wed May 6 11:56:02 CEST 2009
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 01:37:46AM -0700, Jason Garrett-Glaser wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:33 AM, Baptiste Coudurier
> <baptiste.coudurier at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Vitor,
> > On 5/6/2009 12:23 AM, Vitor Sessak wrote:
> >> I was expecting Michael to reject my patch, not the list moderators (see
> >> attached)...
> > Sorry :/
> > Patch is huge :(
> > List says your mail is 800k !!!! ?
> > Cause: Message body is too big: 822865 bytes with a limit of 200 KB
> > I thought that was a mistake.
> Have you seen the sheer size of the TwinVQ tables? Hopefully they are
> a lesson to codec developers to never do such an insane thing ever
It is well learnt - DCA tables take only ~300kB and >250kB for RealVideo 3 and 4
> The easiest way to deal with this would probably be to approve the
> tables separately so that a megabyte patch doesn't have to be sent
> every time.
> Dark Shikari
More information about the ffmpeg-devel