[FFmpeg-devel] [VOTE] FFmpeg leader

Michael Niedermayer michaelni
Sat Oct 2 16:20:28 CEST 2010

On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 07:08:06AM -0700, Jason Garrett-Glaser wrote:
> Of course, this is only useful if such review actually happens.  That
> is, if "no review happens", the result should be a commit, not a patch
> languishing for all eternity.  This gives people an incentive to add
> criticism -- since if they don't criticize the patch, it will go in
> as-is.

that is how it is in ffmpeg
send patch, threaten commit in x days, commit if no reply
i dont think droping the "explicit threten to commit" would make it
better and otherwise its the same as what you describe above.

Also remember mans was the one asking for a patch from mplayer to be blocked
without reason or review not me.

Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible. -- Voltaire
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20101002/c9dcdad3/attachment.pgp>

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list