[FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] New FFmpeg maintainership

Ivan Kalvachev ikalvachev
Sat Jan 22 12:05:29 CET 2011

On 1/22/11, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbultje at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Stefano Sabatini
> <stefano.sabatini-lala at poste.it> wrote:
>> On date Wednesday 2011-01-19 01:58:53 +0100, Diego Biurrun encoded:
>>> The discontent reached the point where a fork was being contemplated
>>> and then planned, but it turned out that the momentum had soared way
>>> past critical mass and turned into a tidal wave of revolution.  The
>>> focus moved from forking to avoiding a fork if possible.
>> But unfortunately it never passed from considering to ask to the
>> person/s which were considered the cause of the "problem" to change
>> for the last time, or to discuss this publically, giving a chance to
>> these persons to defend themselves, and eventually pose an ultimatum
>> and act in the case they failed.
> I've read this statement by various people in a variety of ways now. I
> want to make something very clear: this is not true. I won't spill all
> the details, but suffice to say that we felt that we tried enough and
> that another approach was needed to advance.

I'm afraid we cannot take your word on that.

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list