[FFmpeg-devel] to hijack or not to hijack (was: [PATCH] source snapshots back in action since a long time)

Nicolas George nicolas.george
Wed Mar 2 18:22:32 CET 2011

Le duodi 12 vent?se, an CCXIX, Attila Kinali a ?crit?:
> > and the bandwidth,
> Not correct.

Can you elaborate? Are the bandwidth requirements of ffmpeg so large that
the foundation could not afford them?

> ffmpeg.org belongs to Fabrice and points to natsuki and...
> surprise! surprise! To servers owned by my brother and me.

The target of of DNS record can be trivially changed if necessary, but
that's not my point.

My point is this: your argument that you did not hijack the server as it
belongs to you (I summarize) is void: it's not the server as a piece of
plastic and metal and moving electrons that matters but the server as target
of the DNS records.


  Nicolas George
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20110302/41224340/attachment.pgp>

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list