[FFmpeg-devel] to hijack or not to hijack (was: [PATCH] source snapshots back in action since a long time)
Wed Mar 2 19:46:13 CET 2011
On Wed, 2 Mar 2011 19:34:37 +0100
Reimar D?ffinger <Reimar.Doeffinger at gmx.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 06:07:14PM +0100, Attila Kinali wrote:
> > 3) The main server does not belong to FFmpeg but to MPlayer. FFmpeg is only
> > a guest on MPlayers server. Sofar i have not heard any complaints from the
> > MPlayer side regarding this. (Yes, i know that the money to buy the server
> > was collected from both MPlayer and FFmpeg).
> I assume it's valid to feel that this concerns me?
> My opinions on this are at most slightly less strong than Michael's,
> Carl's or Baptiste's.
> I object to the fact that I am not out to anger you for various reasons (mostly
> that I do not really have an issue with your role as far as I am aware currently)
> being taken as agreement or even non-objection.
Could you please rephrase this in a different way? I'm not sure
i understood what you want to say correctly.
But, what do you object? Handling the FFmpeg case? Or our handling
of the server regarding MPlayer?
If it's the former, this i regard as FFmpeg internal matters.
If it's the later, i'd like to ask you to elaborate as i don't
want that any of this mess affects on how MPlayer development
And don't fear that you would anger me. This is not easily possible
and very few people got me that far.
It is the unknown we fear when we look
upon death and darkness, nothing more.
-- Albus P. W. B. Dumbledore
More information about the ffmpeg-devel