[FFmpeg-devel] [patch] - fixes a few prores 4444 samples
jonne.ahner at gmail.com
Tue Sep 20 18:20:30 CEST 2011
Something like this then?
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at>wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:18:09PM +0200, Jonne Ahner wrote:
> > Yes. But there is less difference between luma and chroma444 than between
> > chroma and chroma444
> > Maybe rename them decode_slice_full and decode_slice_half?
> > Would that make sense?
> > I would maybe prefer then to add a parameter to decode_slice_full that
> > changes the order of the last step.
> > Suggestion for that parameter name, rotation?
> block_order or block_scan come to mind but rotation is fine with me too
> Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
> In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face.
> -- Diogenes of Sinope
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 6659 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the ffmpeg-devel