[Libav-user] http live streaming implementation in ffmpeg
niulicheng at gmail.com
Thu Aug 9 10:13:23 CEST 2012
I am recently undertaking a project about http live streaming.
When I read ffmpeg code, I see both hls.c and hls_protocol.c are included in
ffmpeg－0.11. It looks like that hls.c implement http live streaming as a
demuxer, while hls_protocol.c implement http live streaming as a IO
protocol. I have no idea which implementation is better.
Then I see a log in ffmpeg:
"Using the hls protocol is discouraged, please try using the hls demuxer
instead. The hls demuxer should be more complete and work as well as the
protocol implementation. "
It seems like that the ffmpeg developers considers hls demuxer as the better
In my point of view, the structure of hls protocol is more clear. I am
confused about this.
So would anyone explain the advantage of hls demuxer? Is it more powerful or
efficient? or just because it is with less bugs and more stability?
View this message in context: http://libav-users.943685.n4.nabble.com/Libav-user-http-live-streaming-implementation-in-ffmpeg-tp4655557.html
Sent from the libav-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the Libav-user