[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] add a close function to bitstream filter
Benoit Fouet
benoit.fouet
Mon Sep 3 15:00:34 CEST 2007
Aurelien Jacobs wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Sep 2007 14:16:06 +0200
> Benoit Fouet <benoit.fouet at purplelabs.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> here is a patch to $subj
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Index: libavcodec/avcodec.h
>> ===================================================================
>> --- libavcodec/avcodec.h (revision 10287)
>> +++ libavcodec/avcodec.h (working copy)
>> @@ -33,8 +33,8 @@
>> #define AV_STRINGIFY(s) AV_TOSTRING(s)
>> #define AV_TOSTRING(s) #s
>>
>> -#define LIBAVCODEC_VERSION_INT ((51<<16)+(42<<8)+0)
>> -#define LIBAVCODEC_VERSION 51.42.0
>> +#define LIBAVCODEC_VERSION_INT ((51<<16)+(42<<8)+1)
>> +#define LIBAVCODEC_VERSION 51.42.1
>> #define LIBAVCODEC_BUILD LIBAVCODEC_VERSION_INT
>>
>
> I think adding such a feature would require incresing minor, not micro...
>
>
ok
>> Index: libavcodec/remove_extradata_bsf.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- libavcodec/remove_extradata_bsf.c (revision 10287)
>> +++ libavcodec/remove_extradata_bsf.c (working copy)
>> @@ -52,4 +52,5 @@
>> "remove_extra",
>> 0,
>> remove_extradata,
>> + NULL,
>> };
>>
>
> All those NULLs added to the end of existing bsfs are useless.
>
>
why ?
is there any guarantee that the memory is set to zero for non static
variable ?
> Except those comments, patch looks fine.
>
--
Ben
Purple Labs S.A.
www.purplelabs.com
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list