[FFmpeg-devel] [patch] - fixes a few prores 4444 samples

[Michael Niedermayer]

On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:18:09PM +0200, Jonne Ahner wrote:
> Yes. But there is less difference between luma and chroma444 than between
> chroma and chroma444
> 
> 
> Maybe rename them decode_slice_full and decode_slice_half?
> Would that make sense?

probably


> 
> 
> I would maybe prefer then to add a parameter to decode_slice_full that
> changes the order of the last step.
> Suggestion for that parameter name, rotation?

block_order or block_scan come to mind but rotation is fine with me too

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face.
-- Diogenes of Sinope
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20110920/c0b51322/attachment.asc>