[FFmpeg-devel] [patch] - fixes a few prores 4444 samples

[Jonne Ahner]

Something like this then?



On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at>wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:18:09PM +0200, Jonne Ahner wrote:
> > Yes. But there is less difference between luma and chroma444 than between
> > chroma and chroma444
> >
> >
> > Maybe rename them decode_slice_full and decode_slice_half?
> > Would that make sense?
>
> probably
>
>
> >
> >
> > I would maybe prefer then to add a parameter to decode_slice_full that
> > changes the order of the last step.
> > Suggestion for that parameter name, rotation?
>
> block_order or block_scan come to mind but rotation is fine with me too
>
> [...]
> --
> Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
>
> In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face.
> -- Diogenes of Sinope
>
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: patch.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 6659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20110920/ae49bd1d/attachment.bin>