[Libav-user] Compiling without --enable-nonfree still produces non-free library?

Soltic Lucas soltic.lucas at gmail.com
Sun Apr 17 00:34:45 CEST 2011

Le 17 avr. 2011 à 00:22, Kip Warner a écrit :

> On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 00:20 +0200, Soltic Lucas wrote:
>> Oh ok, thanks you very much! Maybe the "--enable-nonfree" option
>> should be a bit clearer on this point. When I read it I thought I
>> could freely use every format supported by my "free" build without any
>> patent concern.
> I agree. Maybe it should be renamed to --enable-binary-only?

Well.. according to Hendrik's explanation, I would use something even more explicit like --enable-non-redistributable.


More information about the Libav-user mailing list