[Libav-user] Compiling without --enable-nonfree still produces non-free library?

Kip Warner kip at thevertigo.com
Sun Apr 17 00:37:50 CEST 2011

On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 00:34 +0200, Soltic Lucas wrote:
> Well.. according to Hendrik's explanation, I would use something even
> more explicit like --enable-non-redistributable.

How about --enable-non-binary-only-redist?

Kip Warner -- Software Engineer
OpenPGP encrypted/signed mail preferred
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/libav-user/attachments/20110416/7002011b/attachment.asc>

More information about the Libav-user mailing list