[Libav-user] Compiling without --enable-nonfree still produces non-free library?

Soltic Lucas soltic.lucas at gmail.com
Sun Apr 17 00:46:29 CEST 2011

Le 17 avr. 2011 à 00:37, Kip Warner a écrit :

> On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 00:34 +0200, Soltic Lucas wrote:
>> Well.. according to Hendrik's explanation, I would use something even
>> more explicit like --enable-non-redistributable.
> How about --enable-non-binary-only-redist?

Sounds a bit complicated and not obvious to me..
(maybe not for someone whose mother tongue is English)

More information about the Libav-user mailing list